ck2024
Paper and abstract submission
Instructions for authors
Abstract
- The draft abstracts submissions is one-page TNR 12 (300 -400 words including title, authors and institutional affiliation).
- The abstract must be in English
- Title 14 TNR, centered 10 TNR authors and institutional affiliation, centered, bold
- The abstract must include Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions and References
- It may not contain any tables or graphs and is restricted to ASCII-characters only.
- Keywords 3 to 5 TNR 12 bold
- An author may submit only one abstract/full-text as the first author and two abstracts/full-text as the co-author
Full text paper
- Full Text submissions is up to 4 to 6 pages will be written in MS Word-compatible file, A4 borderless 2.5,
- Full text will be sent in English
- Title 14 TNR, centered 10 TNR authors and institutional affiliation, centered, bold
- Abstract 12 TNR left-right (up to 250 words)
- Keywords 3 to 5 TNR 12 bold
- Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions and References TNR 12
- Bibliography Your references should be written according to the APA Style. Please omit the reference which is not used in your paper.
- Charts, tables, figures, centered and numbered
- An author may submit only one abstract/full-text as the first author and two abstracts/full-text as the co-author
Review process
The Scientific Committee selects the best manuscripts to be published. The scientific staff requires that all manuscripts sent to be published must be evaluated by 2 independent reviewers in anonymous form The decision regarding the received manuscripts are the following:
The ab initio rejection, without the manuscripts being forwarded to the lectors (in the case of severe faults of writing/content, thematic)
- Accepting the manuscript without modifications;
- Basically, accepting the manuscript, with minor modifications;
- Accepting the manuscript but with major modifications.
The decision will be communicated to the respective author strictly anonymously. During the peer-review process, the lectors will evaluate elements from the Evaluation Protocol table, one which makes direct reference to having published a manuscript considered an original article.
